Understand the method.
The base case starts the chain. The successor implication carries it through every integer in the stated domain.
State exactly what is being proved
Call the statement and state its integer domain. The smallest allowed integer determines the base case.
Check that first case directly. A true starting case is necessary, but it does not establish all the later cases.
Assume one arbitrary case
Assume for one arbitrary integer in the domain. This is the induction hypothesis.
Use that hypothesis to establish . Do not assume the next case or assume the result for every integer.
Make the successor match the statement
Write the target expression with in place of . It tells you what your algebra must reach.
After checking the base case and proving the implication for arbitrary , conclude that the statement holds for every integer in the domain.
See the method in action.
A sum identity
Prove for integers .
Worked solution
- 1
Check the base case.
Both sides equal , so the first allowed case is true.
- 2
State the induction hypothesis.
Assume this holds for one arbitrary integer .
- 3
Add the next term and simplify.
Use the hypothesis only for the sum to . The additional term is .
- 4
Conclude for the stated domain.
The checked base and arbitrary successor step establish the identity for all positive integers.
for every integer , by mathematical induction.
Divisibility
Prove is divisible by for integers .
Worked solution
- 1
Check the base case.
The first allowed case is a multiple of .
- 2
State the induction hypothesis.
Assume divisibility for one arbitrary integer .
- 3
Expose the assumed multiple of four.
The quantity is an integer, so the next case is also divisible by .
- 4
Conclude by induction.
The base case and successor implication cover every integer in the domain.
is divisible by for every integer .
Try it yourself.
Calculate, explain, then apply.
Choose the base case
For a statement covering integers , which base case is required?
Show answer & reasoning
.
Start at the first integer in the stated domain; starting later leaves earlier allowed cases unproved.
Keep practising
6 worksheet questions · 13 marks
Read the questions online
- Check the base case for , for .2 marks
- State the induction hypothesis for .2 marks
- Check the first case of even for integers .2 marks
- For positive integers , write the induction hypothesis for divisible by six.2 marks
- A theorem is stated for at least 4, but the proof starts at . Which case is omitted?2 marks
- Why is an induction hypothesis not an assumption that the whole theorem is true?3 marks
Read the worked solutions
Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.
- Check the base case for , for .2 marks
Both sides equal 1.
At , . - State the induction hypothesis for .2 marks
Use consistently in every position.
Do not assume the next case.
For arbitrary integer , assume . - Check the first case of even for integers .2 marks
The smallest allowed integer is 0.
Zero is even.
At , . - For positive integers , write the induction hypothesis for divisible by six.2 marks
The integer condition on expresses divisibility.
Assume for some integer and arbitrary integer . - A theorem is stated for at least 4, but the proof starts at . Which case is omitted?2 marks
The successor implication cannot run backward.
. - Why is an induction hypothesis not an assumption that the whole theorem is true?3 marks
is assumed temporarily for arbitrary .
The base case and successor implication together establish every required case.
It is the premise in one conditional implication.
Curriculum reference & lesson scope
SACE Board of South Australia
Stage 2 Specialist mathematical induction. Explicit summation, power and divisibility identities; induction of inequalities or recursive formulae is not required.
Official curriculum source ↗