Understand the idea.
One matching input is not enough
Two expressions are equivalent when they give equal values for every permitted input. An algebraic law can establish this for all inputs at once: expanding gives regardless of the real value of .
One matching input does not establish equivalence. The expressions and both give at , but at they give and . They agree sometimes without being equivalent.
| x | 2x | x + 3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 3 | 6 | 6 |
| 5 | 10 | 8 |
Prove or disprove appropriately
To prove equivalence, transform one expression into the other using valid algebra, or simplify both to the same form. Each equality must join expressions with the same value for all permitted inputs, rather than merely report a convenient numerical test.
To disprove equivalence, find one counterexample: a permitted input for which the values differ. One failure is sufficient; many matching tests are still not a proof of an identity. Check denominator restrictions before choosing a test input.
See the method in action.
Prove equivalence
Are and equivalent?
Worked solution
- 1
Expand the first expression.
The distributive law is valid for every real x.
- 2
Collect the constant terms.
Adding -3 and 4 gives 1 without changing the x term.
- 3
Compare with the second expression.
The algebra reaches exactly the second form, so the expressions are equivalent.
Yes; both simplify to .
Find a counterexample
Test the claim that and are equivalent.
Worked solution
- 1
Choose a permitted test input.
Both expressions are defined at zero, making it a valid candidate counterexample.
- 2
Evaluate the first expression.
The entire difference inside the brackets is multiplied by 5.
- 3
Evaluate the second expression.
Only x is multiplied by 5 in this expression.
- 4
Use the unequal values to reject the claim.
One permitted input with unequal outputs disproves equivalence. Expanding correctly gives .
Not equivalent; is a counterexample.
Try it yourself.
Check your understanding
Are and equivalent?
Show answer & reasoning
Yes.
Yes. Expanding and collecting gives for every real , which proves equivalence.
Keep practising
6 worksheet questions · 14 marks
Read the questions online
- Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
- Are and equivalent? Give a counterexample if not.2 marks
- Show is equivalent to .2 marks
- Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
- Two expressions agree at . Explain why this does not prove equivalence, using your own pair.3 marks
- Show and are equivalent. Is allowed?3 marks
Read the worked solutions
Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.
- Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
for all .
Yes. - Are and equivalent? Give a counterexample if not.2 marks
but .
No; gives 6 and 2. - Show is equivalent to .2 marks
.
Both simplify to . - Are and equivalent? Explain.2 marks
Expanding the second expression gives .
Yes. - Two expressions agree at . Explain why this does not prove equivalence, using your own pair.3 marks
At both give 4.
At the values are 2 and 0, so they are not equivalent.
For example, and agree at 2 but differ at 0. - Show and are equivalent. Is allowed?3 marks
because 4 is non-zero.
The denominator does not contain .
They are equivalent, including at .
Curriculum reference & lesson scope
Australian Curriculum v9 / SA Curriculum
Year 9 algebraic simplification and equivalent expressions, with consolidation of linear formula skills. Binomial expansion and quadratic factorisation/equations are in the separate Quadratics and Parabolas chapter.
Official curriculum source ↗