Understand the idea.
Round once, not at every step
Early rounding replaces a value before later operations use it. Multiplication or powers can enlarge its error, while subtracting close quantities can make a small initial error large relative to the final result.
Keep exact fractions, roots and wherever possible. On a calculator, use the stored result instead of retyping a shortened display. This removes avoidable arithmetic error but cannot remove uncertainty already present in measured inputs.
| Calculation | Exact result | Early rounded result |
|---|---|---|
| 3 × (10/3) | 10 | 3 × 3.33 = 9.99 |
| 6 × (1/3) | 2 | 6 × 0.33 = 1.98 |
| (√50)² | 50 | 7.07² = 49.9849 |
Match precision to the task
A recurring fraction and its rounded decimal are different numbers. For example, is exact whereas is slightly smaller. Repeating the approximation repeats its error; adding later decimal places cannot recover the discarded amount.
Round the final requested quantity to the specified or defensible precision. A long calculator display does not make rough measurements more accurate. Keep units throughout so that the numerical error can also be interpreted in context.
See the method in action.
Cancellation first
Compare 3×(10/3) exactly with 3×3.33.
Worked solution
- 1
Calculate with the exact fraction.
The factor of three cancels exactly.
- 2
Calculate after replacing the fraction by a rounded decimal.
The approximation is slightly less than .
- 3
Compare the totals.
The early-rounded total is too small.
10 versus 9.99
Retaining pi
A circle has exact radius 10 cm. Compare circumference using pi and using 3.14.
Worked solution
- 1
Retain the exact circumference.
The radius is exact, so the multiple of is exact.
- 2
Calculate with the substituted approximation.
Replacing by introduces a small underestimate.
- 3
Measure the resulting difference.
Compare the unrounded expression with the approximated calculation before rounding the difference.
cm; about 0.03185 cm difference
Try it yourself.
Check your understanding
Compare 6×(1/3) and 6×0.33.
Show answer & reasoning
2 and 1.98
exactly, while . The early approximation makes the total too small.
Keep practising
6 worksheet questions · 13 marks
Read the questions online
- Compare exactly with .2 marks
- Compare exactly with .2 marks
- Calculate exactly and compare with .2 marks
- Find the circumference of an exact-radius 4 cm circle to 2 decimal places, rounding at the end.2 marks
- Compare with , both to 2 decimal places.2 marks
- A ruler gives 4.2 cm to the nearest 0.1 cm. Does reporting a derived area to 8 decimal places make that measurement more precise?3 marks
Read the worked solutions
Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.
- Compare exactly with .2 marks
Exact factors cancel.
.
1 and 0.98 - Compare exactly with .2 marks
The exact square root squares to 50.
.
50 and 49.9849 - Calculate exactly and compare with .2 marks
The exact result is .
.
and 2.68 - Find the circumference of an exact-radius 4 cm circle to 2 decimal places, rounding at the end.2 marks
.
Round once to 25.13.
25.13 cm - Compare with , both to 2 decimal places.2 marks
.
.
223.61 and 224.00 - A ruler gives 4.2 cm to the nearest 0.1 cm. Does reporting a derived area to 8 decimal places make that measurement more precise?3 marks
The length remains uncertain by up to 0.05 cm.
Extra arithmetic digits cannot remove instrument uncertainty.
No.
Curriculum reference & lesson scope
Australian Curriculum v9 and SA Curriculum
Surface area of composite solids; volume of composite solids; proportion/scaling of objects; related length/area/volume factors; measurement error; the effect of rounding and repeated approximations; practical design models; evaluating assumptions and suitable precision.
Official curriculum source ↗