ASCENTLEARNING
Join a weekly class
Skip to learning content
YEAR 10 · MEASUREMENT AND SCALE · 18 MIN

The effect of rounding and repeated approximations

Retain exact quantities and guard digits until the final calculation.

In this lesson

Before you start
  • Exact fractions
  • Rounding decimals
01 / LEARN

Understand the idea.

Round once, not at every step

Early rounding replaces a value before later operations use it. Multiplication or powers can enlarge its error, while subtracting close quantities can make a small initial error large relative to the final result.

Keep exact fractions, roots and π wherever possible. On a calculator, use the stored result instead of retyping a shortened display. This removes avoidable arithmetic error but cannot remove uncertainty already present in measured inputs.

Retaining the exact intermediate quantity
CalculationExact resultEarly rounded result
3 × (10/3)103 × 3.33 = 9.99
6 × (1/3)26 × 0.33 = 1.98
(√50)²507.07² = 49.9849

Match precision to the task

A recurring fraction and its rounded decimal are different numbers. For example, 13 is exact whereas 0.33 is slightly smaller. Repeating the approximation repeats its error; adding later decimal places cannot recover the discarded amount.

Round the final requested quantity to the specified or defensible precision. A long calculator display does not make rough measurements more accurate. Keep units throughout so that the numerical error can also be interpreted in context.

02 / WORKED EXAMPLES

See the method in action.

EXAMPLE 01

Cancellation first

Compare 3×(10/3) exactly with 3×3.33.

Worked solution

  1. 1

    Calculate with the exact fraction.

    3⋅103=10

    The factor of three cancels exactly.

  2. 2

    Calculate after replacing the fraction by a rounded decimal.

    3⋅3.33=9.99

    The approximation 3.33 is slightly less than 103.

  3. 3

    Compare the totals.

    10−9.99=0.01

    The early-rounded total is 0.01 too small.

Answer

10 versus 9.99

EXAMPLE 02

Retaining pi

A circle has exact radius 10 cm. Compare circumference using pi and using 3.14.

Worked solution

  1. 1

    Retain the exact circumference.

    C=2⁢π⁢(10)=20⁢π cm

    The radius is exact, so the multiple of π is exact.

  2. 2

    Calculate with the substituted approximation.

    C3.14=20⁢(3.14)=62.8 cm

    Replacing π by 3.14 introduces a small underestimate.

  3. 3

    Measure the resulting difference.

    20⁢π−62.8≈0.03185 cm

    Compare the unrounded expression with the approximated calculation before rounding the difference.

Answer

20⁢π cm; about 0.03185 cm difference

03 / YOUR TURN

Try it yourself.

Check your understanding

Compare 6×(1/3) and 6×0.33.

Show answer & reasoning

2 and 1.98

6⋅13=2 exactly, while 6⁢(0.33)=1.98. The early approximation makes the total 0.02 too small.

Keep practising

6 worksheet questions · 13 marks

Read the questions online
  1. Compare 7×(17) exactly with 7×0.14.
    2 marks
  2. Compare (50)2 exactly with 7.072.
    2 marks
  3. Calculate 4×(23) exactly and compare with 4×0.67.
    2 marks
  4. Find the circumference of an exact-radius 4 cm circle to 2 decimal places, rounding at the end.
    2 marks
  5. Compare 1005 with 100×2.24, both to 2 decimal places.
    2 marks
  6. A ruler gives 4.2 cm to the nearest 0.1 cm. Does reporting a derived area to 8 decimal places make that measurement more precise?
    3 marks
Read the worked solutions

Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.

  1. Compare 7×(17) exactly with 7×0.14.
    2 marks

    Exact factors cancel.

    7×0.14=0.98.

    1 and 0.98
  2. Compare (50)2 exactly with 7.072.
    2 marks

    The exact square root squares to 50.

    7.072=49.9849.

    50 and 49.9849
  3. Calculate 4×(23) exactly and compare with 4×0.67.
    2 marks

    The exact result is 83.

    4×0.67=2.68.

    83 and 2.68
  4. Find the circumference of an exact-radius 4 cm circle to 2 decimal places, rounding at the end.
    2 marks

    8⁢π≈25.132741.

    Round once to 25.13.

    25.13 cm
  5. Compare 1005 with 100×2.24, both to 2 decimal places.
    2 marks

    1005≈223.60679.

    2.24×100=224.00.

    223.61 and 224.00
  6. A ruler gives 4.2 cm to the nearest 0.1 cm. Does reporting a derived area to 8 decimal places make that measurement more precise?
    3 marks

    The length remains uncertain by up to 0.05 cm.

    Extra arithmetic digits cannot remove instrument uncertainty.

    No.
Checking saved progress…
Curriculum reference & lesson scope

Australian Curriculum v9 and SA Curriculum

Surface area of composite solids; volume of composite solids; proportion/scaling of objects; related length/area/volume factors; measurement error; the effect of rounding and repeated approximations; practical design models; evaluating assumptions and suitable precision.

Official curriculum source ↗

Save your next step.

Create a free account to save your learning progress. Lessons and downloads stay free, with or without an account.

Create free account