Understand the idea.
Rational numbers are ratios of integers
A rational number is a real number expressible as with integers and . Integers, terminating decimals and recurring decimals fit this definition. An irrational real number admits no such representation.
For rational sums, differences and products, combine the integer fractions and check that the denominator remains nonzero. These closure properties are useful in contradiction proofs: if an expression were rational, isolate the known irrational part.
Do not apply closure rules to irrational numbers
Irrational numbers do not share the rational closure rules. Two irrational numbers can sum or multiply to a rational number. A nonzero rational multiple of an irrational number is irrational, because dividing back would otherwise make the original number rational.
To prove a square root irrational, suppose it has a fraction representation in lowest terms. If the equation forces a common factor in both numerator and denominator, it contradicts that initial choice. A calculator display cannot replace this exact argument.
See the method in action.
A rational shift of an irrational number
Prove that is irrational.
Worked solution
- 1
Assume the sum is rational.
A contradiction proof starts by assuming the negation of irrationality.
- 2
Isolate the square root.
The difference of the rational numbers and would be rational.
- 3
Reject the assumption.
This contradicts the established irrationality of . Hence is irrational.
is irrational.
The square root of two
Prove that is irrational.
Worked solution
- 1
Assume a fraction in lowest terms exists.
Every rational number has a representation whose numerator and denominator have no common factor greater than one.
- 2
Square and show the numerator is even.
An odd value would give , which is odd. Since this square is even, must be even.
- 3
Substitute its even form.
Substitution shows that is even, so is also even by the same parity argument.
- 4
Identify the common factor.
Both integers are divisible by two, contradicting the fraction being in lowest terms.
- 5
Conclude irrationality.
The assumed rational representation is impossible.
is irrational.
Try it yourself.
Check your understanding
Is irrational?
Show answer & reasoning
No; the product is 2.
, which is rational. Irrational inputs do not guarantee an irrational product.
Keep practising
6 worksheet questions · 17 marks
Read the questions online
- Prove that the sum of two rational numbers is rational.2 marks
- Prove that a non-zero rational multiple of an irrational number is irrational.3 marks
- Show that is rational.3 marks
- Give irrational numbers whose sum is rational, and another pair whose sum is irrational.2 marks
- Prove that is irrational.4 marks
- Is the reciprocal of a non-zero irrational number irrational? Prove your answer.3 marks
Read the worked solutions
Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.
- Prove that the sum of two rational numbers is rational.2 marks
and are integers and .
. - Prove that a non-zero rational multiple of an irrational number is irrational.3 marks
Let be rational and irrational. If were rational, then would be rational, a contradiction.
The product is irrational. - Show that is rational.3 marks
Let . Then , so .
. - Give irrational numbers whose sum is rational, and another pair whose sum is irrational.2 marks
0 is rational. A non-zero rational multiple of is irrational.
; . - Prove that is irrational.4 marks
Assume in lowest terms. Then .
A square divisible by the prime 5 has its root divisible by 5. Set .
Then , so 5 also divides , contradicting lowest terms.
It is irrational. - Is the reciprocal of a non-zero irrational number irrational? Prove your answer.3 marks
If were rational and non-zero, its reciprocal would be rational, a contradiction.
Yes.
Curriculum reference & lesson scope
SACE Board of South Australia
Stage 1 Mathematics: geometric reasoning and real-number/proof material, regrouped into a school chapter; all exercises are original.
Official curriculum source ↗