Understand the idea.
Create a fair comparison
A fair comparison needs a common starting amount, a common final date and clearly specified cash flows. Build a separate calculation for each account, using its own periodic rate and period count. Include the stated fees before comparing final balances.
A larger nominal percentage does not settle the comparison when compounding frequencies differ. Work out the actual growth factors over the same time. Use unrounded balances to identify the winner, then round the monetary results for reporting.
Test a conclusion
A break-even comparison asks when two final-value expressions are equal. Write both in terms of the same unknown principal, set them equal and solve. The difference between their expressions also shows which account is larger on either side of that principal.
Treat the conclusion as conditional on the supplied rules. A small rate or fee change can reverse a close result, and access, risk or changing rates may lie outside the model. Equal time horizons are necessary when comparing interest dollars.
See the method in action.
Worked example
For 3 years, compare AUD 8000 at 4.4% annual compounding with 4.3% nominal compounded quarterly. No fees.
Worked solution
- 1
Calculate the annual-compounding account.
Three years at annual compounding gives three 4.4% growth periods.
- 2
Set up the quarterly-compounding account.
The nominal annual quote must be converted to a quarterly rate and twelve quarters.
- 3
Calculate the quarterly account's balance.
Both balances now represent the same starting AUD 8000 after the same three years.
- 4
Compare using the unrounded balances.
The annual account finishes higher; using full precision prevents rounding from deciding a close comparison.
Annual account: AUD 9,103.15; quarterly account: AUD 9,095.26. The annual account is higher by AUD 7.89.
Worked example
For one year, A pays 5% simple interest and no fee. B pays 5.5% simple interest and charges AUD 25. For what principal do their final amounts match?
Worked solution
- 1
Express both final amounts in terms of the principal.
Each pays one year of simple interest, while B also deducts its fixed fee.
- 2
Set the final balances equal.
Break-even means neither account finishes with more money.
- 3
Collect the principal terms and solve.
The extra 0.5 percentage points of interest must exactly cover the AUD 25 fee.
- 4
Check the shared balance.
Both rules produce the same final amount at the calculated principal.
AUD 5,000.00
Try it yourself.
Check your understanding
An extra 0.4 percentage points of annual simple interest must cover AUD 20 fees. What principal breaks even?
Show answer & reasoning
AUD 5,000.00
An extra 0.4 percentage points means a decimal rate difference of . Break-even requires , so .
Keep practising
6 worksheet questions · 12 marks
Read the questions online
- Compare AUD 3000 for 2 years at 5% annual compound interest and 4.8% nominal compounded monthly. No fees.2 marks
- A AUD 2500 account earns 4% simple interest for one year and charges AUD 12. Find its final amount.2 marks
- For one year, A pays 3% simple interest/no fee; B pays 4% and charges AUD 18. Find the break-even starting amount.2 marks
- A model predicts A exceeds B by AUD 4 after 2 years. Explain why a possible AUD 10 closing fee matters.2 marks
- One account pays a fixed 4% for 2 years; another pays 5% only for the first year. Can a 2 year final comparison be determined?2 marks
- Compare 10% total growth over 2 years with 12% total growth over 3 years using annualised rates.2 marks
Read the worked solutions
Equivalent correct methods earn the corresponding marks. Include units where asked.
- Compare AUD 3000 for 2 years at 5% annual compound interest and 4.8% nominal compounded monthly. No fees.2 marks
Evaluate and .
Annual: AUD 3,307.50; monthly: AUD 3,301.64. - A AUD 2500 account earns 4% simple interest for one year and charges AUD 12. Find its final amount.2 marks
.
AUD 2,588.00 - For one year, A pays 3% simple interest/no fee; B pays 4% and charges AUD 18. Find the break-even starting amount.2 marks
.
.
AUD 1,800.00 - A model predicts A exceeds B by AUD 4 after 2 years. Explain why a possible AUD 10 closing fee matters.2 marks
If only A incurs the extra 10,its advantage becomes .
It can reverse the ranking. - One account pays a fixed 4% for 2 years; another pays 5% only for the first year. Can a 2 year final comparison be determined?2 marks
A first-year promotional rate does not specify both years.
No; the second-year rate or balance rule is missing. - Compare 10% total growth over 2 years with 12% total growth over 3 years using annualised rates.2 marks
Annual factors are and .
The two-year option has the higher annualised rate.
Two-year option: 4.881%; three-year option: 3.850%.
Curriculum reference & lesson scope
SACE Board of South Australia
Stage 1 General Mathematics: investing and borrowing. Supplied educational models cover interest, investment comparisons, shares and credit; they are not recommendations of real products or statements of personal tax liability.
Official curriculum source ↗